Shri. Chandrakant Kisanrao Bhurkunde v. Shri. Dayaram S/O Marotrao Choudhari And Another

crwp1008.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1008/2014 Shri Chandrakant Kisanrao Bhurkunde ..vs.. Shri Dayaram Marotrao Choudhari and anr. __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

Mr. M. V. Mohokar, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. C. F. Bhagwani, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Khan, A.P.P. for respondent no.2.

CORAM : A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.

DATE :

JUNE 19, 2015.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is that for finding out the age of the ink utilized, the Court should have referred the document to the Government Press at Nasik.

On instructions, Mr. Khan, the learned A.P.P. submits that there is no facility available at Government Press, Nashik. On the contrary, job of Government Press, Nashik is to print currency notes, Court Fee Stamps and nothing more.

That being so, the application filed before the trial Court or as the case may be was without finding correct place where such a scientific investigation could made.

crwp1008.14 In view of above, I pass the following order.

ORDER

(i) Criminal Writ Petition No.1008/2014 is dismissed with costs of Rs.2,000/- payable to Mr.Bhagwani, learned counsel for respondent no.1, reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner that if he finds any forum for scientific investigation either Government or private, he is at liberty to apply for expert examination.

JUDGE kahale