← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7003/2024disposed off

Ambadas Baliram Dhage And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Mumbai And ORS.

2025-07-10Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil3 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:6547-DB 1 J-WP No.7003.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 7003 OF 2024 1) Ambadas Baliram Dhage, Aged about 56 years, Occ.-Service, R/o. Near Jot, Gahuli, Tq. Pusad, Dist. Yavatmal.

2) Sidhartha Sriram Rathod, Aged about 43 years, Occ.-Service, R/o. At Post-Gahuli, Tq. Pusad, Dist. Yavatmal.

3) Jagdish Bandu Rathod, Aged about 59 years, Occ.-Service, R/o. At Post-Gahuli, Tq. Pusad, Dist. Yavatmal.

4) Dyandev Tukaram Mathne, Aged about 53 years, Occ.-Service, R/o. At Post-Gahuli, Tq. Pusad, Distt. Yavatmal.

.... PETITIONERS // VERSUS // 1) The State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32.

2) The Divisional Social Welfare Officer, Amravati Division, Amravati.

3) The District Social Welfare Officer, Yavatmal, Dist. Yavatmal.

.... RESPONDENTS

2 J-WP No.7003.2024.odt ______________________________________________________________ Mr. N. Z. Mirza, Advocate for Petitioners.

Ms. Deepali Sapkal, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

______________________________________________________________ CORAM :

MRS. M. S. JAWALKAR AND PRAVIN S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 10 th JULY, 2025.

ORAL JUDGMENT :- (Per : M. S. JAWALKAR, J.) 1.

Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2.

Matter is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission by consent of the parties and on request of the parties. 3.

The learned Counsel for Petitioners, by this Petition, claiming second benefit of "The Assured Career Progress Scheme". The representation of Petitioners dated 26.09.2024 is pending before the Divisional Social Welfare Officer, Amravati Division, Amravati and the District Social Welfare Officer, Yavatmal i.e. Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

4.

The Petitioners are limiting their relief to the extent that the said Representation dated 26.09.2024 be directed to be decided.

3 J-WP No.7003.2024.odt 5.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 seeks eight weeks time to decide the said representation.

6.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is partly allowed. 7.

The Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are hereby directed to decide the representation dated 26.09.2024 filed by the Petitioners, within a period of eight weeks.

The Writ Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. No order as to costs.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) Kirtak