Bombay High CourtWP/6604/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Om Sai Bahu-Uddeshiya Edu. Soc.-Sai Nursing College, Tumsar Thr. President, K. Choudhary And Others v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary, Medical Education And Drugs Department, Mumbai And Others

2016-12-21Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi2 pages

2112wp6604.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6604/2016 Om Sai Bahu-Uddeshiya Education Society - Sai Nursing College, Tumsar, District Bhandara through its President and others ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Medical Education & Drugs Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 400032 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for petitioners Shri Sanjeev Deshpande, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1 Ms Vidya Umale, Adv. h/f Shri A.V. Khare, Adv. for respondent no.2 Mrs. Gauri Venkatraman, Advocate for respondent no.3 CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 21.12.2016 The learned Counsel for the petitioners states that after filing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel could lay hand on some decisions rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that the permission from the Indian Nursing Council would not be necessary for enhancement of the intake capacity and it would be enough if the Maharashtra Nursing Council grants permission to increase the same. It is stated that in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the petitioner would take appropriate steps and it would not be necessary for the petitioners to prosecute the writ petition.

2112wp6604.16.odt In view of the aforesaid statements, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE Wadkar