Akash S/O. Vishnu Dhurve v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Ballarsha
1 aba698.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (ABA) NO.698 OF 2018 (AAKASH VISHNU DHURVE & OTH....VS.. STATE OF MAH. THR. PSO PS BALLARSHA, CHANDRAPUR.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Mahesh Rai, Advocate for Applicants.
Shri H.D.Dubey, A.P.P. for Non-applicant/State. CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.
DATED : OCTOBER 03, 2018.
Heard.
Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.1062 of 2018, registered by the non-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 149, 452, 323, 427, 506-B of the Indian Penal Code, the applicants seek prearrest bail. The applicant Nos.1 to 4 claim that they are students.
The crime is registered against the applicants on the complaint that in the procession of Ganpati Immersion, the applicants focused laser light on the women and girls and when they were asked not to do so they created ruckus near the house of the complainant and caused damage to the complainant's vehicle and cooler.
The application is opposed on the ground that the investigation is still under progress and whereabouts of 3 or 4 co-accused are not known and they have to be traced and for that custodial interrogation of the applicants is required.
2 aba698.18 Considering the nature of accusations against the applicants and accepting the submission made on behalf of the Investigating Agency that custodial interrogation of the applicants is required, I am not inclined to show any indulgence at this stage.
The application is dismissed.
JUDGE RRaut..