Ghanshyam S/O Punaji Pardhi And Others v. State Of Maha., Department Of Corp., Marketing And Textiles Division, Mumbai Thr. Secty. And Others
WP6610-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6610/2016 (GHANSHYAM PUNAJI PARDHI & OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.K. Tambde, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Nikhil Joshi, A.G.P. for the R-1 to 3.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 16 , 2016.
Shri Tambde, the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the grievance of the petitioners would stand redressed, if this Court directs the respondents to conduct the election to the A.P.M.C., within a time frame. Shri Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent nos.1 to 3, states on instructions that the elections to the A.P.M.C. would be concluded within four months.
By accepting the statement made on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3, that would be binding on the said respondents, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs.
JUDGE JUDGE APTE