Bombay High CourtWP/6575/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Rushikesh S/O Gajanan Kakade v. Divisional Caste Certificate Verification Committee No.1, Amravati Thr. Secretary And Others

2016-12-06Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

WP6575-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6575/2016 (RUSHIKESH GAJANAN KAKADE VERSUS DIVISIONAL CASTE CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE NO.1, AMRAVATI & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri K.S. Narwade, counsel for the petitioner. Shri I.J. Damle, A.G.P. for the R-1 & 2.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 6 , 2016.

Shri Narwade, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that during the pendency of the petition, the caste validity certificate is issued in favour of the petitioner. It is stated that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed in view of the aforesaid position.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE