Sau. Devyani Bhimrao Palekar v. Vidharbha Irrigation Devp. Corporation Nagpur, Thr. Exe. Engineer Bembla Project, Yavatmal And Othe

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR FIRST APPEAL NO.821/2017 APPELLANT :

Sau. Devyani Bhimrao Palekar (On R.A.) Age - 65 yrs., Occ.- Agriculturist (Ori. Appellant) R/o Kolhi, Tq. Babhulgaon, Dist. - Yavatmal.

...VERSUS...

NON-APPLICANTS: 1) Vidarbha Irrigation Development (Ori. Appellant) Corporation Nagpur through Executive On R.A.

Engineer Bembla Project, Yavatmal.

2) The Special Land Acquisition officer, Bembla Project, Yavatmal.

3) The State of Maharashtra through Collector, Yavatmal.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri A.B. Nakshane, Advocate for appellants Shri M.A. Kadu, Advocate for non-applicant/respondent no.1 Mrs. S.S. Jachak, AGP for non-applicant/respondent nos.2 and 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.

DATE : 01/12/2022 ORAL JUDGMENT 1.

Heard Shri A.B. Nakshane, learned counsel for the appellants, Shri M.A. Kadu, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 and Mrs. S.S. Jachak, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent nos.2 and 3.

2.

The appeal challenges the judgment of the learned Reference Court dated 02/12/2011 in respect of agricultural land bearing Gat No.424 admeasuring 3.91 HR for Village Kolhi, on account of submergence in the Bembla River Project, a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, in respect of which, was issued in the Official Gazette for the State of Maharashtra on 05/06/2003. The award was passed on 22/09/2005, granting total compensation of Rs.72,909/- per hectare, which has been enhanced by the learned Reference Court by the judgment dated 02/12/2011 to Rs.1,65,000/- for agricultural land.

3.

Shri Nakshane, learned counsel for the appellant has strongly relied upon the judgment of the learned Reference Court, dated 12/05/2015 in L.A.C. No.396/2007 (Janardhan Maroti Sahare & others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Through - Collector, Yavatmal & others), which also is in respect of land bearing Gat No. 105 admeasuring 1.21 HR of Village Kolhi in the same project, from the same notification, in which the learned Reference Court, has enhanced the compensation for agricultural land at the rate of Rs.2,68,000/- per hectare, First Appeal No.954/2017 (The Executive

Engineer, Bembla Project Division, Yavatmal Vs. Janardhan Maroti Sahare and others), against which, has been withdrawn, which has been recorded in the judgment dated 12/10/2018 by this Court, in view of which, it is apparent, that the present respondent no.1 has accepted the rate of Rs.2,68,000/- per hectare as the rate for agricultural land in Village Kolhi.

4.

Though, it is tried to be contended by Shri Kadu, learned counsel for the respondent no.1, that the land in the present case was dry crop land and that is the point of distinction why the rate of Rs. 2,68,000/- per hectare ought not to be granted, however, a perusal of the judgment in Land Acquisition Case No.396/2007 would indicate, that the land in that case was also a dry crop land and therefore, there is no point of distinction available on this count. There is no other material brought to my notice by Shri Kadu, learned counsel for the respondent no.1, either from the evidence or from the document on record to enable me to take a different view, considering which, it would be appropriate to enhance the rate of agricultural land to Rs.2,68,000/- per hectare.

5.

Hence, the first appeal is allowed by enhancing the rate of agricultural land to Rs. 2,68,000/- per hectare. 6.

The respondent/acquiring body will make appropriate calculations and deposit the compensation in this Court within six weeks from today. While making the calculations, the waiver of interest for the period of 1377 days as recorded in the order dated 20/06/2017 on Civil Application No.1157/2016 shall be taken into consideration. The difference in court fee shall be paid within one month thereafter, if any. No order as to costs. (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Wadkar SUKHADEORAO WADKAR