Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University, Nagpur Thr. Registrar v. The District Collector, Nagpur

WP6594-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6594/2016 (R.S.T.M. NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, NAGPUR VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NAGPUR) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri P.B. Patil, counsel for the petitioner.

Mrs. B.H. Dangre, G.P. with Shri A.A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for the respondent.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 23 , 2016.

We were not inclined to entertain the writ petition in view of the provisions of the Maharashtra Land Requisition Act, 1948.

However, the learned Government Pleader fairly states that since it is the case of the petitioner that the experts that have come to Nagpur for conducting the interviews are residing in the part of the premises and they would be stationed at Nagpur till the interviews are concluded on 27.11.2016, the petitioners could make a representation to the Collector, Nagpur and the Collector, Nagpur would consider the same at the earliest.

The petitioner-University, if it so desires, could make a representation to the Collector, Nagpur, who in turn would consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders.

The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE

WP6594-16 APTE