Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Through Its Chief Executive Officer v. Mohd. Ilyas Sk. Lalu And Another

caf963.18 7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CAF NO.963/2018 IN FA ST.NO.23954/2014 Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, Amravati, thr. its Chief Executive Officer and anr ..vs..

Mohd. IIyas Sk. Lalu and anr ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court orders or directions Court's or Judge's Order and Registrar's orders ............................................................................................................................................................................................. Shri Sharad Thakare, counsel for the applicants. Shri S.A. Mohta, Counsel for non-applicant No.1. Shri I.J. Damle, AGP for non-applicant No.2.

CORAM

: V.M. DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER25, 2018.

1.

Heard learned counsel Shri Sharad Thakare for the applicants, learned counsel Shri S.A. Mohta for non-applicant No.1, and learned AGP Shri I.J. Damle for non-applicant No.2 on this application for condonation of delay in preferring an appeal.

2.

After having perused contents of the application which are duly affirmed by Office of the applicants and also Clerk on whose fault the appeal remained to be filed within limitation, I am satisfied that the applicants have made out a case for condonation of delay. 3.

Consequently, the application is allowed. The delay is hereby condoned. Office is directed to register the first appeal. The civil application stands disposed of accordingly.

FA ST.NO.23954/2014 Heard.

ADMIT.

The record and proceedings be called for.

Learned counsel Shri S.A. Mohta waives service for respondent No.1 and learned AGP Shri Damle waives service for respondent No2.

.....2/-

caf963.18 7 CAF No.974/2018 1.

This is an application for grant of Stay.

2.

The present application will be considered only after depositing entire decretal amount in this Court by the applicant. 3.

Learned counsel Shri Sharad Thakare for the applicant submits that entire decretal amount will be deposited within a period of 3 months' from today.

4.

It is made clear that this Court has not granted any Stay to the execution if it is filed by the claimant.

JUDGE !! BRW !!

...../-