Aklesh Parashramji Shingone v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Ps Warud Tq. Warud And Dist. Amravati Rural

2024:BHC-NAG:12588 14appln125.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPLN) NO. 125 OF 2024 Aklesh Parashramji Shingone Vs State of Maharashtra Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. Anshula Paunikar, counsel h/f Mr. S.V. Sirpurkar, counsel for applicant. Ms. Kavita Bhongde, APP for non-applicant/State. CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.

DATED : 18/11/2024.

1.

This is an application for relaxation of condition. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is released on bail by the Sessions Court on the condition that he shall not enter into the Village Ampend, Tah. Warud, District Amravati till the culmination of the trial.

3.

She further submitted that there is no other person in the family to cultivate the land, as the land of the present applicant is situated in the vicinity of village Ampend, Tah. Warud, District Amravati. In view of that, the condition imposed by the Sessions Court be relaxed. 4.

Learned APP strongly opposed the said application. 5.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State, perused the order passed by the Sessions Court, from which it reveals that there was an apprehension that if the applicant/accused is released on bail, he would tamper with the prosecution evidence. It is rkn

14appln125.2024.odt further alleged that due to the ill-treatment at the hands of the present applicant, his wife has committed suicide. Considering the nature of the offence, the condition was imposed. At this stage, no grounds are made for the present applicant for the relaxation of the condition. 6.

In view of the above, the application is rejected. [URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.] rkn