← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6892/2014admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Shri Raju S/O Chelaram Vensayani v. The State Of Mharahstra Through Secretary, The Ministry Of Urban Development Department,Mumbai And

2016-01-28Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

WP6892-14 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 6892/2014 (RAJU CHELARAM VENSAYANI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Ingole, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.S. Khubalkar, A.G.P. for the R-1.

Shri R.O. Chhabra, counsel for the R-2 to 4.

CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 28 , 2016.

The learned counsel for the parties state that the issue involved in this case was also involved in Writ Petition No.1315 of 2015 and this Court has, by the judgment dated 28.01.2016, allowed the writ petition and quashed a similar notice issued by the respondent no.2-Nagpur Improvement Trust. It is stated that a similar order could be passed in this writ petition also. Hence, for the reasons recorded in the judgment dated 28.01.2016 in Writ Petition No.1315 of 2015, we allow this writ petition. The impugned notice is quashed and set aside. The respondent no.2 is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law.

Order accordingly. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE