← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/236/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Prabhu Ramji Ghodekar v. Union Of India Through Secretary Ministry Of Micro, Samall And Medium Enterprises, New Delhi And Ot

2016-02-25Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

1 wp236.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.236 OF 2015 [Prabhu Ramji Ghodekar .vs. Union of India and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.R. Rajgure, counsel for the petitioner, Shri N.S. Rao, AGP for the respondent nos.3 and 4. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND A.S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.

DATED : FEBRUARY 25, 2016.

Shri Rajgure, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that after the writ petition was filed, the respondents have withdrawn the impugned orders and the grievance of the petitioner does not survive. It is stated that the said fact is also stated by the petitioner vide pursis dated 25.2.2016. In view of the statement recorded hereinabove, we dispose of the writ petition, with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulandes