Hemlata W/O Dhirandra Shambharkar v. State Of Maharashtra, Dept. Of Forest-Thr. Its Principal Secretary, Mumbai And ORS.

2025:BHC-NAG:1474-DB

15. WP 2086 of 2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.2086/2024 Hemlata w/o Dhirandra Shambharkar ...Versus...

State of Maharashtra, Department of Forest - Through its Principal Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. A.R. Patil, Advocate for petitioner Mr. J.Y. Ghurde, AGP for respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 Mr. S.A. Chaudhari, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATE : 13/02/2025 1.

It is contended that there is no policy framed by respondents No.4 and 5 for permitting the registration of Gypsy vehicles for transporting tourists inside the TATR. 2.

Issue notice for final disposal to respondents Nos.1 to 4, returnable on 25/02/2025.

3.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. J.Y. Ghurde waives service of notice for respondents No.1, 2 & 4, and Mr. S.A. Chaudhari, learned counsel, waives service of notice for respondent No.3.

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.2926/2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2086/2024 1.

The petitioner moved this application to permit her to amend the petition, as subsequent developments have

15. WP 2086 of 2024.odt occurred after filing the petition. Therefore, she wants to bring those developments on record.

2.

Mr. Ghurde, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 & 8, and Mr. Chaudhari, learned Counsel for respondent No.3, formally objected to the said application.

3.

Having considered the reasons stated in the application and the fact that the matter has yet to be admitted, we deem it appropriate to allow the application. Hence, the civil application is allowed. The petitioner is directed to carry out the amendment within one week and supply a copy of the amended petition to the other side within one week thereafter. 4.

The respondents are at liberty to file additional replies to the said petition, if any they want, within two weeks thereafter.

5.

The civil application stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) Kolhe/Wadkar