← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1418/2023allowed

Dr. Ashok S/O Ramdasji Mhaske v. Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola Through Its Registrar And Others

2025-08-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:7478 1 CAO1418-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO.1418 OF 2023 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION ST. NO. 19472 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 146 OF 2015(D) (DR. ASHOK RAMDASJI MHASKE...VS..DR. PANJABRAO DESHMUKH KRISHI VIDYAPEETH, AKOLA & OTH. ) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Ankush M. Tirukh, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri Arjun Abhay Sambre, Adv. h/f. Shri Abhay Sambre, Adv for Resp. No.1 to 3. CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J.

DATED : AUGUST 01, 2025.

1.

There is delay of two days in filing the review application. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention to the reasons stated in the application explaining the delay.

2.

According to the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 the delay is not properly explained.

3.

However, considering the reasons stated in the application, I am of the opinion that satisfactory reasons are provided and furthermore considering the period of delay, I am of the opinion that the application needs to be allowed. Hence, the application is allowed. Delay in filing the review application is condoned.

2 CAO1418-2023 List the Misc. Civil Application No.19472 of 2023 on 12/09/2025 for consideration/hearing.

JUDGE RRaut..