M/S Jai Mahalaxmi Fruits Company, Through Proprietor, Janardan S/O Ramaji Porkute v. State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary, Agricultural Department, Mumbai And Others
1 wp6742.16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6742 OF 2016 [M/s. Jai Mahalaxmi Fruits Company, Nagpur .vs. State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.A. Sonak, counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. G.R. Tiwari, AGP for respondent no.1, Shri Uday Dastane, counsel for respondent nos.2 and 3. ..........
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATED : NOVEMBER 30, 2016.
Shri Sonak, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition and it may be permitted to withdraw the same. Permission is granted.
The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA