← Library
Bombay High CourtCAF/3510/2014admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Dr. Sau. Savita Sureshrao Potdukhe And Another v. Sandip S/O Kesharimalji Zanwar And Others

2015-02-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION F. NO.3510/2014 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1093/2013 Dr. Sau. Savita Sureshrao Potdukhe and another ...Versus...

Sandip s/o Kesharimalji Zanwar and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Amol Mardikar, Advocate for applicants/appellants Shri S.V. Sohoni, Advocate for respondent no.2 CORAM : Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 02.02.2015 Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

Shri Mardikar, the learned Counsel for the applicants/appellants states that the copy of the civil application is served on Shri Alok Upasani, the learned Advocate for the respondent no.1, who is the contesting party. For the reasons stated in the application and the fact that it is not opposed inasmuch as reply is not filed, the appellants are granted time till 27.2.2015 to deposit the amount. The civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. JUDGE Wadkar