Bombay High CourtSA/126/2015dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri. Mahadeo Sakharam Shende v. Narayan Raghunath Pothbhare

2018-10-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar1 pages

SAs123TO126-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR SECOND APPEAL NO. 123/2015 (DIVAKAR SURYABHAN KINHEKAR VERSUS NARAYAN RAGHUNATH POTBHARE) WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 124/2015 (SURESH HARIBHAN GHINMINE VERSUS NARAYAN RAGHUNATH POTBHARE) WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 125/2015 (VANITA VASANT PARCHAKE VERSUS NARAYAN RAGHUNATH POTBHARE) WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 126/2015 (MAHADEO SAKHARAM SHENDE VERSUS NARAYAN RAGHUNATH POTBHARE) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - None for the appellant.

Shri M.I. Dhatrak, counsel for the respondent. CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 23 , 2018.

There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on 16.10.2018 and hence the appeal was kept today. Though the matter has been called out twice, there is no appearance on behalf of the appellant.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution under provisions of Order XLI Rule 17(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

JUDGE APTE