Farook Harun Chini v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department Of Home, Mumbai And Others

1608wp928.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Cri. Writ Petition No.928 of 2016 (Farook Harun Chini -vs.- The State of Maharashtra, thr. its Secretary, Mumbai & others) ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's orders Mr. S.S. Jaiswal, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. S.M. Ukey, Addl.P.P. for the State.

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & MANISH PITALE, JJ.

DATE : 16.08.2017.

By this petition the petitioner has raised grievance that F.I.R. dated 31.07.2016 registered at his behest under Section 324, 504, 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') has not been registered in terms of facts stated by him or grievance raised at his behest. The petitioner prayed that the directions be given for registration of offence under Section 307 of IPC.

2.

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and we are of the opinion that ends of justice would be meet by giving direction to the respondent No.3 the Superintendent of Police, Yeotmal, to investigate into the

1608wp928.16.odt complaint made by the petitioner by taking into consideration his written complaint dated 16.08.2016 along with the opinion of the Doctor which has come on record during investigation, as also statements of witnesses recorded by the investigating authorities thereafter.

3.

Respondent No.3 may take steps for investigation in accordance with law and thereafter proceed in the matter. In our opinion, this should satisfy the grievance raised by the petitioner in this petition. Hence, disposed of in above terms. JUDGE JUDGE waghmare