← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6820/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Shri Sadanant W. Lagahate v. Bank Of Maharashtra, Nagpur Through Authorized Officer And Others

2016-12-05Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1/1 wp6820.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 6820 OF 2016 Sadanant W. Lagahate -vsBank of Maharashtra, Nagpur, thr.its Authorized Officer and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.A.R.Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner.

Mrs.G.Tiwari, AGP for the respondent No.3.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 05.12.2016.

The petitioner has approached this court against the order of the Tahsildar, Hingna, issued in pursuance of the order passed by the learned District Magistrate under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 with the limited request for grant of interim relief solely on the ground that the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur is not functioning in the absence of the Presiding Officer. Mrs.Tiwari, the learned Assistant Government Pleader states on instructions that the charge of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur is with Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Mumbai at present and though the Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Mumbai would retire on 13/12/2016, by that time, the Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur would resume his duties. In view of the statement made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition. The writ petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

The points raised in the petition are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE KHUNTE