Mrs. Leeni W/O. Chandrakant Sardar And Another v. Mr. Chandrakant S/O. Haridas Sardar

2023:BHC-NAG:16503 1 appr 360.2023.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Criminal Application (APPR) No. 360 of 2023 in Criminal Revision Application No.

of 20 [Mrs. Leeni W/o Chandrakant Sardar and anr. ..vs.. Mr. Chandrakant Haridas Sardar] with Criminal Revision Application No.

of 20 [Mr. Chandrakant Haridas Sardar ..vs.. Mrs. Leeni W/o Chandrakant Sardar and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. Leeni Sardar, Applicant in person Ms. P. M. Chandekar, Advocate for the non-applicant/husband CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J .

DATED : 10-11 -202 By speaking to minutes, the wife Mrs. Leeni Chandrakant Sardar has brought to the notice of the Court that there occurred certain inadvertent/clerical mistakes in the judgment pronounced on 26-10-2023. In paragraph no. 3, the date of marriage is written as 1-2-2007 instead of 11-2-2007. Further in the same paragraph on page no. 3 of the judgment, the date 10-10-2011 ought to have been written as 19-10-2011. In paragraph no. 11 in sixth line, the word Librarian should be replaced by Lecturer. In the same paragraph, on page no. 7, the word 'HDFC' is incorrectly written and it should be replaced by 'Maharashtra Institute of Engineering Technology (MIET)'.

In paragraph no. 15, on page no. 9, in last line, the date 19.12.2011 should be replaced by 19.10.2011.

2 appr 360.2023.odt The corrections be made accordingly and corrected copy of the judgment be uploaded.

The applicant submits that there also occurred apparent error in the judgment as regards findings that she was in employment in the year 2014. She seeks permission to file review petition. To my mind, if according to Mrs. Leeni Chandrakant Sardar, there is an error apparent on the face of record, she is entitled to file review petition, which if filed, will be considered on its own merit.

The application is disposed of in above terms. (Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik