Bombay High CourtWP/934/2016rejected

Mohd. Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul (In Jail) v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Divisional Commissioner, Nasik And Another

2017-03-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain1 pages

1 cwp934.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.934 OF 2016 [Mohd. Yakub Abdul Masjid Nagul .vs. State of Maharashtra and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Radha Mishra, Advocate [Appointed] for petitioner, Shri V.P. Maldhure, APP for respondents.

..........

CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND KUM. INDIRA JAIN, JJ.

DATED : MARCH 21, 2017.

By way of present petition, the petitioner is seeking extension of parole by further period of 11 days.

The petitioner was twice granted extension and as such availed the maximum period of 90 days. As such, the period of 11 days cannot be considered to be the period during which the petitioner would be legally entitled to be on parole. No merit is found in the petition and hence the petition is rejected.

Fees of the learned counsel appointed on behalf of the petitioner are quantified at Rs.1500/-. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande