Bombay High CourtWP/1301/2016dispossed offdismiss for default

Shreeram S/O Thima Pise And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr Collector Nagpur And Others

2016-12-19Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.A. Naik,Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Swapna Joshi1 pages

1 wp1301.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.1301 OF 2016 [Shreeram Thima Pise and others .vs. The State of Maharashtra and others] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Kshirsagar, Advocate for the petitioners, Shri I.J. Damle, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 3, Shri M.M. Agnihotri, Advocate for respondent no.4. ..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : DECEMBER 19, 2016.

By this writ petition, the petitioners have sought a direction against the respondents to pay enhanced compensation to the petitioners.

On the 24th of October, 2016, a statement was made by the learned counsel for the M.I.D.C. that in view of the compromise entered into, between some of the other land holders and the respondent no.4, the petitioners would also be paid on similar lines. In view of the aforesaid statement, the petitioners have submitted their proposal to the respondent no.4-M.I.D.C. but the same is not decided till date.

In view of the agreement between the parties that the petitioners would accept the amount that is offered to the petitioners in terms of the compromise entered into, between some of the land holders and the respondent no.4-M.I.D.C., we dispose of the writ petition, with a direction to the respondent no.4-M.I.D.C. to abide by his statement and pay the compensation as per the compromise between the other land holders and the respondents, to the petitioners within two months. Order accordingly. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE Gulande, PA