← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/2615/2015admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Gangadhar Diwalu Parate v. State Bank Of India Through Its Chief Manager, Mumbai And Another

2016-01-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai,Hon'Ble Shri Justice P.N. Deshmukh1 pages

111caw2615.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAW) No.2615 of 2015 in Writ Petition No.2523 of 2004 (D) (Gangadhar s/o. Diwalu Parate .vs. State Bank of India, Mumbai and anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr.S.N.Kumar, Adv. for the applicants.

Mr.R.S.Parsodkar, Adv. for the petitioner.

CORAM : B. R. GAVAI AND P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : 11.1.2016.

Heard.

Civil Application No. 2615 of 2015 is filed by the respondents/applicants for speaking to minutes of the Judgment and Order dt.3.7.2015 passed by this Court.

It is submitted that, in paragraph no.4 in second line of the said Judgment, the word 'second' is wrongly transcribed. The contention appears to be correct. Hence, the application is allowed.

The word 'second' appearing in second line of paragraph 4 in the Judgment dt.3.7.2015 delivered by this Court shall stand deleted.

JUDGE JUDGE *jaiswal