← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/392/2016dismissedrule discharged

Purushottam S/O Tulshiram Wankhade And Others v. Dr. Kiran Kulkarni, Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati And Another

2017-06-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice B. P. Dharmadhikari,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Baban Deo1 pages

1 cp392.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

CONTEMPT PETITION NO.392 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.490 OF 2016 (Purushottam s/o Tulshiram Wankhede and others ..vs.. Dr. Kiran Kulkarni, CEO, ZP Amravati and another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri K.N. Saboo, Advocate for the petitioners, Shri M.G. Rathi, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI AND ROHIT B. DEO, JJ.

DATED : 20-06-2017 Learned Counsel Shri M.G. Rathi fairly states that during pendency of the contempt petition grievance of the petitioners has been redressed. However, it is submitted that there is unreasonable delay.

As we have not seen mala fide, we are not inclined to keep contempt petition pending. It is dismissed accordingly.

JUDGE JUDGE adgokar