← Library
Bombay High CourtPIL/15/2018disposedoff

Shaikh Yasin Shaikh Gaffar v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Primary Education Department, Mumbai And Others

2018-11-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravi K. Deshpande,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Vinay Joshi2 pages

PIL15-18 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 15/2018 (SHAIKH YASIN SHAIKH GAFFAR VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri R.G. Kavimandan, counsel for the petitioner. Shri N.R. Patil, A.G.P. for the R-1 to 4, 8 to 10. Smt. S.S. Jachak, counsel for the R-5.

Shri N.R. Saboo, counsel for the R-6.

CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE AND VINAY JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : NOVEMBER 21 , 2018.

In pursuance of the order dated 11.08.2015 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.1143 of 2015, the question of eligibility of release of grants to the Society, which runs the respondent no.6-school, for the period from 2016 onwards at various levels of the Government was considered. The ultimate decision of the Government in response to the order passed by this Court is that there was no illegality in release of grants. The said decision was taken on 18.06.2016 which is not the subject matter of challenge in the petition.

So far as the illegalities in transfer of school from one place to another is concerned, there is some proposal by the Director of Education (Primary) to the Principal Secretary given on 06.04.2018. It is open for the State Government to take appropriate decision in the matter, if not already taken, after giving an opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties. The public interest litigation stands disposed of.

PIL15-18 All the interim orders passed in this public interest litigation are vacated.

(VINAY JOSHI, J.) (R.K. DESHPANDE, J.) APTE