← Library
Bombay High CourtCAS/1058/2024allowed

Shrikrushna Laxman Kuware v. Santosh Tejrao Deshmukh

2025-12-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi1 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:13867 6.cas.1058.24 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAS] No.1058 of 2024 in Second Appeal St. No.22707 of 2024 Shrikrushna Laxman Kuware vs. Santosh Tejrao Deshmukh =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mrs. S.W. Deshpande, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. G.G. Mishra, Advocate for the Non-Applicant/Respondent.

CORAM

: ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 9 th DECEMBER, 2025.

Heard.

02.

This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 68 days in filing the second appeal. It is stated that the appellant was suffering from Chikungunya, as a consequence of which, the appeal could not be preferred within the prescribed period of limitation. 03.

Although, the learned Advocate for the respondent opposes the application, having regard to the fact that the statement regarding ailment is made on oath, this Court is of the considered opinion that the delay deserves to be condoned.

04.

The civil application is allowed by condoning the delay. 05.

Office to register the appeal. List the appeal for hearing on admission on 16th January, 2026.

JUDGE *sandesh