← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPA/859/2025allowed

The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Sub-Divisional Officer, (Competent Authority, Appointed Under Mpid) v. Sanjeev S/O Shankarrao Khade And Another

2025-11-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode1 pages

1 apeal 70.2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Criminal Application (APPA) Nos. 859 and 860 of 2025 in CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 70 OF 2021 [The State of Maharashtra through S.D.O. appointed under MPID Act, Nagpur vs. Sanjeev s/o Shankarrao Khade and anr.] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ - - - Mr. N. R. Rode, APP for the applicant/appellant Mr. R. N. Ghuge, Advocate for respondent no. 2 CORAM: ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.

DATED : 03-11-2025.

These applications are for setting aside abatement of appeal and for bringing legal representatives of respondent no. 1 on record. As such, respondent no. 2 is one of the legal representative of respondent no. 1, being wife of respondent no. 1, however, appellant-State intends to add respondent no. 1's son, being another legal representative of respondent no. 1.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. The appellant shall add name of respondent no. 1's son as party respondent no. 3.

Issue notice to newly added respondent no. 3. Mr. R. N. Ghuge, learned counsel waives notice for newly added respondent no. 3.

List the appeal for final hearing on 20-11-2025. JUDGE JUDGE wasnik