Shyamsundar Liladharji Bhutada v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Nadgaon Peth, Tq And Dist., Amravati

2025:BHC-NAG:13744 1 / 3 10-aba 770-25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION(ABA) NO. 770 OF 2025 Dr.Shyamsundar Liladhariji Bhutada Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Anil S.Mardikar, Senior Adv. a/b Mr. Digvijay Singh, counsel for the applicant.

Ms.Trupti Udeshi, APP for the State.

Ms.Varsha Warade, appointed counsel for non applicant No.2.

CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 08/12/2025 1.

The applicant is apprehending his arrest in Crime No.334 of 2025 registered with Police Station Nandgaon Peth, district Amravati City for the offences punishable under Sections 64(2) (m) and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2.

The victim is a nurse in the hospital, where the applicant is Principal. It is alleged that since, 2022, the applicant had illicit relations with her by giving assurance that he will promote her as matron. She has made serious allegations about unnatural sex with her. The allegations are

2 / 3 10-aba 770-25 made that he asked her to bring her daughter also and therefore, she has lodged the complaint.

3. The learned Senior Advocate for the applicant has stated that since, 2022 victim has not lodged any complaint against the applicant, only because she was terminated, due to registration of First Information against her, the complaint is lodged. Hence, prayed to protect him by granting protection.

4.

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant has stated that the applicant is attending the police station regularly as per the conditions imposed.The learned APP has conceded for the same.

5.

The learned counsel for the non applicant No.2 has requested for time to file some documents on record. Considering the allegations made in this case, the necessity of the additional documents is not required as the applicant is attending the police station and counter FIR is there. The Management has terminated the services of the first informant, she has lodged the complaint. Considering the allegations made against this applicant, the interim protection granted on 10/10/2025 is required to be confirmed on same terms and conditions except condition No.(iv). Hence the following order:-

3 / 3 10-aba 770-25 i] The application is allowed.

ii] The order dated 10.10.2025 granting adinterim anticipatory bail is confirmed. iii] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called by the investigating officer. iv] The application stands disposed of.

6.

Fees of the appointed counsel be paid as per rules. JUDGE