Vinod S/O Harichand Chauhan v. Smt. Manjusha W/O Vinod Chauhan

FCA14-16 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO.2025/2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 14/2016 (VINOD HARICHAND CHAUHAN VERSUS MANJUSHA VINOD CHAUHAN) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.V. Khare, counsel for the appellant/non-applicant. Ms Pallavi A. Chavan h/f Shri S.S. Dhengale, counsel for the applicant/respondent.

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND V.M. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 04 , 2017.

It is stated on behalf of the non-applicant that the alimony for three months could not be deposited in the month of November, though it was due then, in view of the demonetisation policy. It is stated that the entire dues are, however, cleared in the month of December-2016 and as on today, nothing is outstanding towards the amount of maintenance pendente lite.

In view of the aforesaid, the prayer made in the civil application cannot be granted. The civil application stands disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE APTE