Vinod S/O Jagannath Tagde v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Ps Durgapur Dist Chandrapur

(1) 920crwp830.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.830/2025 Vinod Jagannath Tagde .Vs. State of Maharashtra --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. D. Chande, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. K. R. Lule, A.P.P. for respondent.

CORAM :

ANIL L. PANSARE AND RAJ D. WAKODE, JJ.

DATE :

DECEMBER 3, 2025.

On 13.10.2025, following order was passed:

"Leave to amend the prayer clause is granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith.

2.

The substantive prayer is as under:

"i) direct the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chandrapur to decide the Reg. Cri. Case No. 100/2014 pending since 2014, within the stipulated period in the interest of justice." 3.

Thus, the petitioner is seeking direction against the Judicial Magistrate First Class to decide the matter in time bound manner.

4.

The petitioner shall place before us the number of matters pending before the Magistrate which were filed prior to the proceeding under question. Once the details are furnished, we will be facilitated to pass appropriate orders. 5.

The petitioner may also make request to the learned Magistrate for disposal of the matter expeditiously. 5.

List after Diwali Holidays."

2.

The petitioner has not placed before us the details of number of matters pending before the Magistrate, which were filed prior to the proceeding under question. This would mean that the petitioner is avoiding furnishing necessary details, which otherwise will indicate that there are certain matters lodged prior to the year 2014 which are pending before the Court of learned Magistrate. 3.

In the circumstances, it will not be appropriate to direct the Magistrate to decide the cases in a time bound manner. We accordingly dismiss the writ petition. The petitioner, however, is at

(2) 920crwp830.25 liberty to make request to the learned Magistrate for expeditious disposal of the case and if such a request is so made, the same shall be considered by the learned Magistrate depending on the pendency of the matters.

(JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kahale