Bodhiram Suresh Chandrakar v. Senior General Manager Govt. Of India Ministry Of Defence, Nagpur And 2 Others

WP199-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 199/2015 (BODHIRAM SURESH CHANDRAKAR VERSUS SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER, GOVT. OF INDIA & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.B. Meshram, counsel for the petitioner. Ms Pathak h/f Shri Rohit Deo, A.S.G.I. for the R-1 to 3. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND PRASANNA B. VARALE, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 17 , 2015.

Learned counsel Ms Pathak holding for Shri Rohit Deo, the learned A.S.G.I. for the respondent nos.1 to 3, raises a preliminary objection to the tenability of the writ petition and states that the petitioner has not availed the alternate remedy of approaching the Central Administrative Tribunal. It is stated that the order impugned could be assailed before the Central Administrative Tribunal.

By upholding the preliminary objection raised on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 3, we decline to entertain the writ petition. The petitioner is free to avail the alternate remedy. The writ petition stands disposed of.

The points raised in the petition are kept open. JUDGE JUDGE APTE