The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Gadchiroli, And Another v. Shri. Raju Sanyasi Atram, And Another

mca435.445.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.435/2015 Shri Amarsingh Sikandar Gedam ..vs.. The Chief Executive Officer, Z. P. Gadchiroli and ors.

AND Misc. Civil Application (Review) No.445/2015 The Chief Executive Officer, Z. P. Gadchiroli and ors. ..vs.. Shri Raju Sanyasi Atram and anr.

IN Writ Petition No.1026/2014 (D) Shri Raju S. Atram ..vs.. The Chief Executive Officer, Z. P. Gadchiroli & ors. _______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

______________________________________________________________________________ Mr. P. S. Kshirsagar, Advocate for applicant in Misc. C. A. No. 435/2015 Mr. W. G. Paunikar, Advocate for applicants in Misc. C. A. No. 445/2015 Mrs. Neeta Jog, Advocate for petitioner in W. P. No.1026/2014 CORAM : A.B.CHAUDHARI AND Z. A. HAQ, JJ.

DATED : 26.06.2015 Heard learned counsel for the rival parties.

Learned counsel for the review applicants in both these applications have, relying upon Rules 5 and 6 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1982, contended that the judgment and order impugned is wrong and, therefore, is liable to be reviewed.

mca435.445.15.odt We have considered the submissions made by learned review-applicants. We have seen the impugned judgment and order. The present applications for review are in the nature of fresh arguments in the same matter. No ground for review is made. Hence, we pass the following order.

ORDER

(i) Misc. Civil Application (Review) Nos.

435/2015 and 445/2015 are rejected.

No order as to costs.

JUDGE JUDGE kahale