← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/777/2025disposed off

Shahbaz Khan S/O Pyaru Khan v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso Yashodhara Nagar Dist Nagpur

2025-11-10Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:11687 1 / 2 16-aba-777-25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION(ABA) NO. 777 OF 2025 Shahbaz Khan Pyaru Khan Vs. State of Maharashtra ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.

or directions and Registrar's orders.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Yash Venkatraman, counsel for the applicant. Ms.Mrunal Barabde, APP for the State.

CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 10/11/2025 1.

The applicant has apprehension of arrest in Crime No.612 of 2024 registered at Police Station Yashodhara Nagar, District Nagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 420,465,467,468 and 471 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2.

The applicant was protected by this Court on 15.10.2025.

3.

The learned APP has stated that the earlier bail application was withdrawn by this applicant, as disinclination to grant the bail was shown by this Court. The amount was transferred in the account of this applicant. The active role is played by this applicant. Though the applicant is attending the police station, the bail may be rejected. Kavita

2 / 2 16-aba-777-25 4.

The learned counsel appearing for the applicant has stated that the role played by this applicant is mentioned by the complainant in his earlier complaint and has changed his version. The said complaint was not brought to the notice of the Yashodhara Police Station. According to the learned counsel for the applicant there was no transaction between the applicant and the complainant and he has mentioned it in his earlier complaint. Earlier, one of the accused was arrested and he is released on bail. Considering the allegations made against this applicant, the custodial interrogation of this applicant is not required. The application is required to be allowed on the same terms and conditions imposed in the order dated 15.10.2025. Hence, the following order:- i] The application is allowed.

ii] The order dated 15.10.2025 granting ad-interim anticipatory bail is confirmed.

iii] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when called by the investigating officer.

iv] The application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Kavita