← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/1100/2019dismissedrule discharged

Deepak Babulalji Malviya v. Devidas Domaji Khonde

2019-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale2 pages

1 cao1100.19.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAO) No.1100/2019 IN MCASt No.24652/2018 in Rej. S.A. No.630/2010 (S.A.St. No.14378/2010) Deepak Malviya Vs.

Devidas Khonde - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 03, 2019 On 27/08/2019, this Court passed the following order in the present application.

"This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 2926 days in filing an application for restoration of second appeal, which was dismissed on 17.04.2014.

2.

This application was listed on 10.06.2019 when none appeared on behalf of the applicant.

On 17.06.2019, this application was adjourned for six weeks at the request of the learned counsel for the applicant. Thereafter, when this application was listed on 29.07.2019 and 13.08.2019, on both occasions, none appeared on behalf of the applicant.

3.

Even today when this application is called out for hearing, none has appeared on behalf of the applicant. Hence, list on 03.09.2019 under the caption "for dismissal".

2 cao1100.19.odt 2.

Even today, when the application is called out none has appeared on behalf of the applicant, thereby showing that neither the applicant nor his Advocate are interested in pursuing the present application.

3.

Hence, dismissed for want of prosecution.

JUDGE MP Deshpande