Sau. Sandhya Haridas Meshram v. Haridas Chintamanji Meshram
CAO491-15 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. 491/2015 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL ST. NO. 25464/2014 (SANDHYA HARIDAS MESHRAM VERSUS HARIDAS CHINTAMANJI MESHRAM) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri A.R. Deshpande, counsel for the applicant. CORAM : SMT.VASANTI A. NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JUNE 6 , 2016.
Heard. Perused the contents of the application. None appears for the sole respondent, though served. The statements of facts made in the civil application remain uncontroverted.
The delay of 89 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of. F.C.A. ST. NO.25464/2014.
Heard.
ADMIT.
Call for Record & Proceedings.
JUDGE JUDGE APTE