Bhaurao Balaji Nagarkar, Chandrapur v. Smt. Vithabai Keshav Kamble, And 9 Others
1 wp3705.14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3705 OF 2014 (BHAURAO BALAJI NAGARKAR...VS.. SMT. VITHABAI KESHAV KAMBLE & 2 OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Amit Choube, Adv. h/f. Shri A.A.Naik, Adv. for Petitioner. Shri K.R.Lule, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 7, 8 and 9. Shri Bhushan Mohta, Advocate for LRs of R-2 and 2(i). CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.
DATED : MARCH 01, 2017.
CAW NO. 2681/2016 & CAW NO. 2682/2016.
Accepting the reasons given in the civil application delay of 332 days in filing the application for bringing legal representatives of the respondent No.2 (i) on record is condoned and the petitioner is permitted to bring on record the legal representatives of the respondent No.2(i), whose details are given in paragraph 3 of Civil Application No. 2681 of 2016.
The civil applications are allowed accordingly. CAW NO. 1528/2015 & CAW NO. 1529/2015.
Accepting the explanation given in the civil application, which are not controverted inasmuch as the reply is not filed, the delay of 379 days in filing the application for bringing legal representatives of the respondent No.2 on record is condoned and the petitioner is permitted to bring on record the legal representatives of the respondent No.2,
2 wp3705.14 whose details are given in paragraph 3 of Civil Application No. 1529 of 2015.
The civil applications are allowed accordingly. W.P.NO. 3705/2014.
Shri Bhushan Mohta, advocate waives notice of the writ petition on behalf of the newly added respondents (i.e. Legal Representatives of the respondent Nos.2 and 2(i). JUDGE Rraut..