Bombay High CourtAPPA/822/2016allowed

Kiran Tonpe, Proprietor Suvidha Sales v. Sumit S/O. Chhedilal Shahu, Proprietor Shri Sai Sales

2017-04-13Hon'Ble Kum. Justice Indira Jain1 pages

1 appa822.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPA] NO.822 OF 2016 [Kiran Tonpe .vs. Sumit Chhedilal Shahu] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : KUM. INDIRA JAIN, J.

DATED : APRIL 13, 2017.

Heard Shri H.I. Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant.

For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of. CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APPA] NO. OF 2017 Heard Shri H.I. Kothari, learned counsel for the applicant.

Perused the impugned order. In view of the reasons stated in the application, leave to prefer an appeal is granted.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2017 Heard Shri H.I. Kothari, learned counsel for the appellant.

Admit.

Filing of paper book is dispensed with.

Considering the nature of controversy, put up the appeal for final hearing in the next week. JUDGE Gulande