Bombay High CourtWP/2109/2017dismissedrule discharged

Sagar Arjunrao Ganeshe v. Sou. Kavita Sagar Ganeshe

2019-01-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Z.A. Haq1 pages

1 wp2109.17

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 2109/2017 Sagar Arjunrao Ganeshe ..VS..

Sou. Kavita Sagar Ganeshe - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri N.D. Khamborkar, Advocate for the petitioner Shri V. Bhise, Advocate for the respondent CORAM : Z.A.HAQ, J.

DATED : 08/01/2019 Heard.

The petitioner - husband has challenged the order passed by the learned District Judge directing him to pay Rs. 17,000/- to the respondent - wife towards the litigation expenses.

After going through the impugned order, I find that the learned District Judge has considered the relevant facts in para no. 4 of the impugned order. The learned District Judge has judiciously exercised the powers vested in him and has not committed any patent illegality or error of jurisdiction.

I see no reason to interfere with the impugned order.

The writ petition is dismissed. In the circumstances, the parties to bear their own costs. JUDGE Ansari