← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/8258/2019disposedoff

Dr. Ambedkar Memorial High School, Through Its President, Shri Bhagwan S/O Ganuji Gadekar v. The Weestern Coalfields Ltd., Through Its Chairman And Managing Director, Nagpur

2020-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil B. Shukre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote2 pages

23wp8258.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO. 8258 OF 2019 (Dr. Ambedkar Memorial High School, Bhadrawati Vs. The Western Coalfields Ltd., Nagpur and ano.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri. Ram Khobragade, Advocate for the petitioner. Mrs. Gauri Venkatraman, for respondent No. 1. CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.

DATED : 01-10-2020 Heard Shri Khobragade, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Venkatraman, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1.

2.

On instructions, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 has made a statement across the bar that if a new application is made by the petitioner for making donations under the head of corporate social responsibility in terms of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 together with all the requisite documents including the latest No Objection Certificate issued by the concerned municipality, same shall be considered by the respondents in accordance with law and subject to approval of the competent authority.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is willing to make an application afresh on the lines stated by the learned counsel for the respondents.

23wp8258.19 4.

In view of above, we are of the view that the issue involved in the petition no longer survives for consideration and as such, petition deserves to be disposed of accordingly.

5.

If any application afresh is made on the lines suggested by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, same shall be considered in accordance with law, subject to approval of the competent authority, in the concerned financial year.

6.

The petition is disposed of in above terms. No costs.

JUDGE JUDGE D.S. Baldwa