Prakash S/O. Keshavrao Paturkar v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer, Sakkardhara Nagpur And Another

1 apl906.16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION [APL] NO.906 OF 2016 [Prakash s/o Keshavrao Paturkar .vs. The State of Maharashtra and one] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Damle, APP for respondent no.1.

..........

CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOS HI, JJ .

DATED : APRIL 03, 2018.

None had appeared on behalf of the applicant on 15.3.2018. The office objection had not been removed. We, therefore, granted two weeks time to the applicant to remove the office objection, subject to payment of costs of Rs.500/- to the High Court Bar Library, Nagpur, within one week. It appears that the office objection is not removed. The office note shows that a pursis in regard to the depositing of costs of Rs.500/- with the High Court Bar Library, Nagpur is not filed. None appears for the applicant today. It is most likely that the applicant is not desirous of prosecuting the criminal application.

Hence, we dismiss the criminal application for want of prosecution.

JUDGE JUDGE Gulande