Kanhaiya S/O Murlidhar Dadure v. State Of Maharashtra, Department Of Higher And Technical Education, Thr. Secretary, Mumbai And ORS

2025:BHC-NAG:10739-DB

(1) 3. W.P.8371.23

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.8371/2023 Kanhaiya S/o Murlidhar Dadure Vs. The State of Maharashtra, Deptt. Of Higher and Technical Education, thr. Its Secretary, Mumbai and Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. S. Shingane, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Raunaq Venkatesh, Advocate for the respondent nos. 4 and 5. Mr. D. R. Bhoyar, Advocate for the respondent no. 2. Mr. I. J. Damle, A.P.P. for the respondent nos. 1 and 3. CORAM :

ANIL L. PANSARE AND Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.

DATE :

OCTOBER 13, 2025 After having heard for sometime, the learned counsel for petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the petition and approach the respondent no. 3 for redressal of his grievance. Permission granted.

2] The petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. If the representation is made by petitioner, respondent nos. 2 and 3 shall act promptly and if it is found that respondent nos. 4 and 5 have unnecessarily not extended benefit, appropriate action should be taken against them. The respondent nos. 2 and 3 shall take decision in the matter within one month from the date on which the application/ representation is made by petitioner. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Shubham