← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/156/2025dismissed

State Of Maha., Dept. Of Medical Education, Thr. Principal Secy., Mumbai And ORS. v. Leela Hanumant Shinde

2025-09-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar2 pages

1 wp 153.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.153/2025 State of Maharashtra and others V Sheela Writ Petition No.156/2025 State of Maharashtra and others V Leela - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------- Mr. Dhumale, AGP for petitioners.

Mr. N.S. Warulkar, Advocate for respondent.

CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , J.

DATE : 15-09-2025.

Heard Mr. Dhumale, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the petitioners and Mr. Warulkar, learned Advocate for the respondent in both the petitions.

2.

By these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the judgment and order dated 16-03-2023 passed by the Industrial Court, Nagpur in Complaint (ULP) No.131/2017. 3.

Learned Counsel for petitioners submits that the controversy is with respect to the decision of the petitioners to exclude past temporary service of the employee for counting it for the purpose of pension and other retirement benefits which is mentioned as a condition in the regularization order dated 05-01-2016. It is pointed out that the controversy involved in the petition is identical to the controversy decided by this Court in the bunch of petitions including Writ Petition No.1482/2023 decided on 05-02-2025. It is pointed out that by this judgment the bunch of

2 wp 153.25.odt petitions involving same controversy were dismissed and the Special Leave Petition challenging the said dismissal was dismissed by the Hon'

ble Supreme Court by order dated 18-08-2025 in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s).39708/2025.

4.

Perusal of the impugned order and the documents on record show that the controversy involved in the petition is identical. Hence, there is no reason to take a different view. For the reasons recorded in the judgment dated 05-02-2025 in Writ Petition No.1484/2023 along with connected matters, the instant petitions are dismissed.

5.

No order as to costs.

(Prafulla S. Khubalkar , J.

) Deshmukh