← Library
Bombay High CourtCAS/1094/2024ca disposed off

Dipali Pravin Chopkar v. Pravin Krushnaji Chopkar

2025-09-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:9878 45.cas.1094.24 1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Civil Application [CAS] No.1094 of 2024 in Second Appeal St.No.20940 of 2024 Dipali Pravin Chopkar vs. Pravin Krushnaji Chopkar =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. Sandip Gurpude, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. K.S. Agrawal, Advocate for the Non-Applicant/Respondent.

CORAM

: ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 26 th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

There is a delay of 456 days caused in filing the second appeal. The appeal arises out of a matrimonial dispute between the husband and the wife. The applicant is the wife. 02.

It is stated in the application that the appeal could not be filed within the stipulated period of limitation due to financial constraints. It is also stated that the applicant has no source of income and has to maintain minor children.

03.

The non-applicant has filed reply opposing the application. However, the contention that the applicant does not have any source of income and has to maintain minor children is not in dispute. 04.

In that view of the matter, the delay caused in filing the second appeal is condoned. Office to register the second appeal. 05.

List the second appeal for consideration on 13th October, 2025.

JUDGE

45.cas.1094.24 2/2 *sandesh