← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/754/2025disposed off

Kishor Gajanan Lode v. State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Jt. Director, Higher Education, Nagpur Division, Nagpur And ORS

2025-02-14Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:1545-DB 20 WP-754-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

WRIT PETITION NO.754 OF 2025 [Kishor Gajanan Lode ..Vs.. State of Maharashtra and Ors.] ______________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

Mr A. A. Dhawas, Advocate for Petitioner.

Ms K. Marpakwar, AGP for Respondents/State.

CORAM

: ALOK ARADHE, CJ. AND A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : 14 th FEBRUARY, 2025.

1.

Heard with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking direction to the respondents to grant pensionary benefits which have been denied to him.

3.

Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the controversy involved in this petition is squarely covered by an order dated 13.11.2024 passed in Writ Petition No.637 of 2022.

4.

In view of aforesaid submission and for the reasons assigned in the said order by the Division Bench of this Court, the communication dated 30.08.2024 is quashed and set aside. 5.

It is directed that the petitioner shall not be treated to be disqualified for retirement benefits on the ground that he has not cleared NET/SET qualification in view of the order of UGC granting exemption dated 05.11.2008. The petitioner is held entitled to the consequential benefits on his retirement.

20 WP-754-2025 6.

The respondent No.3 - Principal, Shantaram Potdukhe College of Law, Chandrapur, is directed to forward the pension papers of the petitioner to the State Government and the State Government shall accordingly release the petitioner's pensionary benifits.

7.

The aforesaid exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of four months from the date of production of copy of this order.

8.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) Tambe