Sou. Sapna W/O Amol Dhabale v. State Of Mah. Thr P.So And Another

1 cr.w.p.1088.19

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1088 of 2019 (Sou. Sapna w/o Amol Dhabale ..vs.. State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Seloo, District Wardha and anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court'

s or Judge'

s orders appearances, Court'

s orders of directions and Registrar'

s orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. R. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. M. K. Pathan, APP for the State/respondent 1 CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATED : 25-01-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner - wife states that the divorce petition by mutual consent is duly filed and that the petitioner - wife has received Rs. 2,50,000/- which she was to receive at the stage of filing of the petition in terms of the compromise.

2.

This statement was made on instructions obtained telephonically.

3.

In this view of the matter, for the present, nothing survives for adjudication.

4.

The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner - wife to approach this Court again, if the other conditions of the compromise are not complied with.

2 cr.w.p.1088.19 5.

The petitioner is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by respondent - husband in this Court pursuant to the order dated 26-10-2020.

JUDGE wasnik by Avinash Wasnik Date:

2021.01.25 17:32:54 +0530 Avinash Wasnik