Bombay High CourtCAO/2052/2018admittedallwdgrantedrule absolute

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Memorial Society Through Its President And Another v. The Presiding Officer, University And College Tribunal, Nagpur And 2 Others

2019-04-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar2 pages

CAO2052-18 FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR C.A.O. NO. 2052/2018 IN MCA ST. NO. 22241/2018 IN W.P. NO. 4497/2015 (D) (DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR MEMORIAL SOCIETY, CHANDRAPUR & ANOTHER VERSUS THE P.O. UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE TRIBUNAL & OTHERS) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, counsel for applicants. Ms S.S. Jachak, A.G.P. for R-1.

Shri Rohit Joshi, counsel for R-2.

Shri Atul Pande, counsel for R-3.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.

DATE : APRIL , 2019.

Considering reasons mentioned in the application, the delay in filing the review application is condoned. Civil application is allowed and disposed of. M.C.A. ST. NO. 22241/2018.

The applicants seek review of the judgment dated 22.09.2017 by which the writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging the order passed by the University and College Tribunal, Nagpur has been dismissed.

It is submitted that the aspect of grant of back wages to the respondent no.1 has not been adverted to either by the University and College Tribunal while allowing the appeal or by the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. In the backdrop of the fact that the special leave petition challenging the very same judgment stands dismissed on 06.08.2018 coupled with the fact that the order of termination has been found to be illegal, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting invocation of review jurisdiction.

CAO2052-18 The review application is therefore dismissed. JUDGE APTE