← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/58/2024disposed off

Dr. Vijayashree Vijay Gulhane v. Shri. Dheeraj Kumar, I.A.S., Commissioner Health Services And M.D., Mumbai

2024-04-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

2024:BHC-NAG:5161-DB 1 cp 58.24.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.58/2024 in Writ Petition No.7918/2022 (D) (Dr. Vijayshree V Dheeraj Kumar) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms S.M. Khan, Advocates for petitioner.

Ms. N.P. Mehta, Addl.GP for respondent.

CORAM : Nitin W. Sambre & Abhay J. Mantri, JJ DATE : 30-04-2024.

The petitioner was served with the order of termination while she was in contractual employment of the respondent on 25-08-2022 and was relieved from service vide order dated 29-08-2022.

2.

The petitioner appears to have preferred two appeals. One against an order of termination dated 25-08-2022 and another vide order dated 29-08-2022 whereby she was relieved from service.

3.

This Court while passing the order in Writ Petition No.7918/2022 along with Civil Application (W) No.2761/2022 directed the respondents, the appeal preferred against the order dated 29-08-2022 to be decided within three months.

2 cp 58.24.odt 4.

Against the order of relieving, the petitioner cannot say that her substantial right has been violated pursuant to the principal order of termination dated 25-08-2022. The appeal preferred against the principal order of termination dated 25-08-2022 was already heard and decided on 26-10-2023. 5.

In that view of the matter, we hardly see any reason to invoke the contempt jurisdiction in the present matter. 6.

We dispose of the petition as the petitioner acknowledges the receipt of order dated 26-10-2023. It is open for her to question the same in accordance with the law. 7.

Contempt Petition stands disposed of. No costs. (Abhay J. Mantri, J.) (Nitin W. Sambre, J. ) Deshmukh