State Of Maharashtra Thr. Dy. S.P. Anti Corruption Bureau Akola v. Vijaysingh Fattensingh Banafar

901appa1046of2017.odt 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO.1046/2017 The State of Maharashtra Thr. Dy. S.P., A.C.B. Akola V/s Vijaysingh Fattesingh Banafar --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.

and Registrar's Orders.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri N. H. Joshi, Addl. P.P. for appellant/State.. CORAM: ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE: 4-4-2018 Heard.

2] The learned Sessions Judge has inter alia recorded a finding that the sanction is vitiated. 3] I have perused the reasoning of the learned Sessions Judge who has held the prosecution has not proved demand and acceptance of illegal gratification. 4] This Court considers it appropriate to have a second look at the evidence on record.

5] Leave to appeal is granted.

901appa1046of2017.odt 2 Criminal Appeal _______/2018 Heard.

2.

Admit 3.

Call for record and proceedings.

4.

Action under Section 390 of Criminal Procedure Code need not be initiated.

rkn JUDGE