Atul Tularam Nagrikar v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Ps Ramnagar Tq And Dist. Gondia
2025:BHC-NAG:14517 1 / 2 17-aba 853-25
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION(ABA) NO. 853 OF 2025 Atul Tularam Nagrilkar Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders.
or directions and Registrar's orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.Vedant Pandey, counsel for the applicant. Ms.M.A.Barabde, APP for the State.
CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 18/12/2025 1.
The applicant is apprehending arrest in Crime No.487/2025 for the offence punishable under Sections 69, 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
2. It is alleged that the applicant, who is the married lady having one son, came in contact with the applicant. They with consent since 2.4.2023 had sexual relations. The allegations are made that he had relations under an assurance of marriage and before the last incident he beat her and gave threats. 3.
The learned counsel appearing for the applicant has stated that now the investigation is completed and the charge-sheet is filed. Considering the allegations made against this applicant prayed to confirm the interim protection granted on 13.11.2025.
Kavita
2 / 2 17-aba 853-25 4.
The learned APP has opposed the application stating that as per the medical report there are contusions and the allegation about assault are there. Hence, prayed to reject the application.
5.
Heard both the sides and perused the record.
6.
It appears that the applicant, who is the married lady having a child had sexual relations with the applicant with consent. They stayed together and when there was breakup she has lodged the complaint alleging that under the assurance of marriage, he had sexual relations. The victim is adult. She is married woman. She knows the consequences. It was with consent. Therefore,, the case is made out to confirm the ad interim protection granted earlier. The interim protection granted on 13.11.20125 is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.
Hence, the following order- i] The application is allowed.
ii] The order dated 13.11.2025 granting adinterim anticipatory bail is confirmed. iii] The application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Kavita