← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/677/2019disposedoff

Shashikalabai Wd/O Wamanrao Wankhede And 2 Others v. Shyamlal S/O Hariram Chandrani And Others

2019-09-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale2 pages

1 cao677.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Civil Application (CAO) No.677/2019 in Misc. Civil Application St. No.26632/2018 in Second Appeal No.220/2018 Shashikant Wankhede & Ors. Vs. Shyamlal Chandrani & Ors. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. V.K. Paliwal, Advocate for appellant.

Mr. S.V. Dhani h/f Mr. S.V. Sononi, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 05, 2019 Heard learned counsel for the applicants.

This is an application seeking review of order dated 10/04/2018, whereby Second Appeal filed by the applicants stood dismissed since it was found that there was no substantial question of law that arose in the Second Appeal.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicants is unable to point out any error apparent on the face of the record in order dated 10/4/2018, passed by this Court. A perusal of the said order would show that it was found by this Court that findings rendered concurrently by the two Courts below holding that the theory of oral agreement propounded by the applicants

2 cao677.2019.odt was not believable, did not require any interference. 3.

As the applicants are unable to point out any error apparent on the face of the record in the order passed by this Court, the application for review is dismissed.

JUDGE MP Deshpande